| Welcome | ||
|---|---|---|
| Welcome to fellowcoat You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. In addition, registered members also see less advertisements. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today! |
||
Golden Fox wrote: As for Mulan, I don't think she's a Princess at all. Just a Disney character.
ThatFellow wrote:Golden Fox wrote: As for Mulan, I don't think she's a Princess at all. Just a Disney character.
Well, Disney considers her a princess, but I think mainly because she stars in a popular film. Her parents aren't royal and she doesn't marry into royalty, so her character isn't really a princess.
If anything, Jane should be a Disney princess, since she does marry the King of the Jungle. But, oh, well. Disney doesn't seem to care much for Tarzan, despite the boat-load of money it made them. And I think the Jane-Tarzan relationship is up there with Tiana-Naveen, Belle-Beast and Aladdin-Jasmine.
ThatFellow wrote: Since Disney bought Pixar, they're now considered the same company according to Lasseter.
Return to Hewy's Animated Movie Reviews
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests